Display Comb 4

/ featured media, post meta, title, read more link and full content

From time to time, there is an incredibly tragic accident where people are killed with guns and this always tends to lead to a gun control debate. I understand and agree with the sentiment. If we could save one life, wouldn’t giving up guns be worth it? Do we really need guns? So let’s legislate away gun violence! Thinking you can control deaths by gun control is as unrealistic as saying you can legislate away depression. Or legislate away violence. Or legislate away stupidity. I think when you consider gun deaths by segment, understanding the flaw in gun control becomes more clear.

Suicide

The biggest category of gun related deaths are currently suicide. 60% of gun related deaths are suicide related according to Wikipedia. In this Freakonomics podcast on suicide, they mention guns are the primary method of suicide among men. More than 50% is what I think they suggested. I think even if you could magically remove every gun from the planet overnight, you would not also eliminate suicide. Or even significantly reduce suicide. Those suicide victims would likely just use another method.

Accidents

It is heartbreaking that anyone would lose their life from a gun accidentally. Worse still is that the victims are usually children. Statistically, it is a small number to the point of being statistically insignificant. A more significant cause of accidental deaths is from automobiles. The solution was seat belts and car seats. Steven Levitt (the economist behind the Freakonomics book) gave a TED talk suggesting car seats are practically useless. Further, he suggested car seat manufacturers were lobbying to push for legislation for car seats, not unbiased research. Fatalities from automobiles and guns are roughly similar, unless you adjust for suicide. The difference is we have made an incredibly amount of legislation in an effort to curb accidental automobile related fatalities. If you have ever wondered why cars aren’t as cool as they were back in the day, automobile safety related regulations are the culprit. Rearview mirrors, blinking lights, break lights, break light placement, frame manufacturing and design, tire manufacturing and design, air bags, seat belts, audible indicators to indicate you should use a seat belt, breaks, and I am sure anyone in the car industry would be happy to add to this list ad nausea. They would also probably say in a hushed voice that they don’t do shit, either. Or at least, not enough to matter. I am sure these safety features lower auto related death rates, but I think there are many other factors that have a much, much greater impact. Drunk driving, texting while driving, distraction from other passengers, and weather conditions are a few obvious culprits.

Murder

I think when people hear “gun fatalities”, they immediately think of murder. And who doesn’t want to end murder. Problem #1: a lot of gun violence is being done by criminals who didn’t get guns through a legal channel anyway. Problem #2: killing people is easy. Just ask the ants. Ants can kill other ants! For that matter, ants can kill people! If an insect can kill without guns, people can probably figure it out as well. Problem #3: making guns is easy. I am pretty sure I could make a gun in an afternoon with a visit to Home Depot. I have never made gun powder from fertilizer, but there is probably a 5 minute YouTube video that shows you how to do it. A gun is basically a pipe with one end capped, a combustive agent, and some projectile.

Trying to lower deaths is noble. It is something I can get behind. And if guns were just used for hunting, I would be the first to get behind gun control. But that is not why it is #2 in the constitution. It is also telling how many police and military people think guns are a good thing. It is counter-intuitive for sure. Gun control is not going to stop suicide. And adjusted for suicide, gun fatalities are not nearly as significant as auto related deaths. If we really want to lower deaths, our time is better spent by building high speed rails. Or taking cell phones away from drivers. You may prevent some deaths with gun control, but it would be offset by an increase in violent crime. In the last few weeks I have heard of a young man getting accidentally shot by his father. But far more common is an intruder getting shot by a gun owning home owner. And I know in today’s world, the idea of revolting against our government sounds crazy. But think how crazy some of our nations leaders have sounded (or sound). Those that forget history are doomed to repeat it. Because if you give up one right, you might end up all of them. And here is my post-Independence-day-thought: I love the idea that this country was founded by farmers that stood up to the greatest military might of the time. They couldn’t have done that without guns.

Today wrapped up Dallas Startup Week. I went to the Game Day, which was the final session of the Video Game track. There were several really cool games and gaming technology being demoed and I was surprised how many video and board games are being developed in Dallas. There was one in particular that caught my attention: Scrapped. Scrapped is a game that was developed as part of a project in the SMU Guildhall program.

So instead of reading my description of the game, you should download and play the game for free. You can complete the game in one sitting. You play the robot C23, which is built in a factory but then is Scrapped because it does not meet some criteria. Once scrapped, you learn that there is a paradise of free robots and your job now is to find your way to that paradise. In other words, being scrapped turns out to be a great thing. Instead of being a robot slave doing some mundane task indefinitely, you are now going to join others and live in paradise. You don’t kill anyone or anything. You don’t try to beat others. You are just using your robot powers to overcome obstacles and get to the goal.

The game is beautiful. It is easy to understand while still challenging enough to be fun to play. The game mechanics, or the robots powers, make sense and are easy to understand and as you move through the game, you use them in different ways. It’s an all around really cool game. The reason I really like it is that I am dyslexic. Dyslexia, according to Wikipedia, “also known as reading disorder, is characterized by trouble with reading unrelated to problems with overall intelligence.” While people usually focus on the deficiencies of dyslexics, they are also known to have above average math abilities. I don’t know if this is common among dyslexics, but I am in the 99th percentile for visual-spacial problems. Albert Einstein and Thomas Edison were also thought to be dyslexic. I was diagnosed very early on with dyslexia and felt “scrapped” by my first school and ended up in a school for children with learning disabilities. In this way, I really related to the game’s hero. I felt that frustration when first getting scrapped. Why? What’s wrong with me? Did I do something wrong? But then was excited to learn that this was a good thing! I could join other’s with the same problem in paradise and skip slavery all together.

After playing the game, I sat with Marcelo Raimbault to discuss SMU’s Guildhall program. He is from Brazil, where he has his own video game business. He felt that even though he had a good deal of experience, Guildhall is a great program where he learned a lot. In fact, his only complaint was that the program was too demanding. The group project also sounded really interesting. Instead of being stuck in one idea, as teams work on projects, they gravitate to other projects they think work better. I know this: the project I played was really impressive.

The Scrapped team is Katie Wood (Game Designer), Marcelo S. Raimbault (Producer), Jon Clark (Producer), Aaron Hamilton (Artist), Baron Capers (Artist), Justin Atkinson (Artist), Tiffany Griffin (Artist), William Vennes (Software Development), Robert Stewart (Software Development), Nathan Bowden (Level Designer), Brian Perry (Level Designer), Colton Revia (Level Designer), David Mershawn (Level Designer), Isaiah Everin (Level Desiand gner), Pranav Kumar (Level Designer), Guido Arcella Diez (Game Composuer), and Rodrigo Nepomuceno “Cheba” (Game Composuer).

I want to start with a quick story. My mom’s dad had 4 daughters. He was a man’s man, fought in WWII, hunted, fished, worked insanely hard for his family, and held to a set of values that today would be labelled as sexist. My grandfather once insisted I turn off Growing Pains because it was too adult. You know, the family show in the 80s starring the notoriously Christian Kirk Cameron. I was his first male grandson and of 8 grandchildren, only two were male. I was given a special kind of attention that I think came from a man who desperately wanted a son and now found that chance in a grandson. He taught me to shoot a gun at an incredibly young age, he took me hunting, trapping, fishing, gave me gifts of guns he brought back from WWII, and let me do things he had not let his daughters do. Like drive a tractor. He had been a small grocery owner but when he retired he bought a small farm in upstate New York with a quite little brook and land for hunting and his horses. Each summer my parents would send me there for a week or two alone with my grandparents and it was a little heaven. I was given free reign to hunt, fish, ride horses, swim in the creek, and generally have experiences that I would only later realize how special and unique they were. Each Christmas all my aunts, uncles, and cousins would get together for what I can only describe as Normal Rockwell-esque and perfect holiday filled with roasted chestnuts and clydesdale drawn sleigh rides. One one such Christmas holiday we went, as was our tradition, out to the far reaches of my grandfathers farm to find a real Christmas tree, cut it down, take it to the house, and decorate it. This particular year, my grandfather was teaching me to drive the tractor. An old, green relic that only an older generation would expect to still run. I won’t bore you with the complexity of the green machine, but I will say it is harder than any stick I have driven since, which is saying something. Now with some practice under my belt, my grandfather was giving me the honor or driving the two aunts and several cousins on our yule tree expedition. Let me tell you about these particular two aunts. On the spectrum of conservative to liberal, they were both on the far end of liberal. To give you some idea, one had told my grandfather in the mid sixties that she was moving in with or sleeping with a man, out of wedlock, and this man was black. Today that would not even register on most people’s liberal scale, but at this point in time, it was scandalous in the extreme. These two liberal aunts started chanting “we want a woman driver” and all my female cousins quickly joined in. It was one of those little things that was meant in good fun, but later that day as I thought about it I found it made me a little pissed. I felt this double standard: on one hand I had aunts that wanted me to open doors for them or take their luggage to their rooms or mow the 2 acres around my grandfathers house, but then when it came to doing something they wanted to do, they changed tune and wanted equality. Not long after that I went to run an errand with my grandmother and we got to the door of the store and she stopped to let me open the door for her. This was probably my pre-teen or early teen years and I was probably through an age where I acted the ass, but I decided in that moment to take a stand against that double standard and stood defiantly for her to open the door for herself. Now thinking about this moment I am in awe of her wisdom. She knew exactly what was going on in my mind and something like, “Is that the world you want to live in? Where men don’t open doors for women? Because with that comes women that aren’t feminine. You can manifest the world you live in and it starts with you opening that door.” I don’t remember exactly what she said because at the time I had no idea how profound the wisdom was she was dropping on me. Pearls! Pearls! Pearls of wisdom!

Today in the paper I saw that that Defense Minister Ash Carter has allowed women to serve in any role. Up to know, women have not been put in front-line combat positions. This is happening at the same time that the UFC has changed their position on female fighters and has allowed women to fight in one of the most, if not THE most brutal and violent sports that is legal in this country. At the same time as Shelby Osborne playing football for a college team. I think there is a big difference between pushing for equal pay or leadership positions in business and putting women in harms way or having men put in a position where they need to hit a woman. I can’t help but think of the poor guy that has to hit a female quarterback because his scholarship rides on his performance and his performance is measured by his ability to hit the quarterback as hard as he can. How long until the UFC decides the best fight is going to be to put a championship female fighter against a championship male fighter? If a woman can be a QB and take hits from men, is it much of a step for a woman to take hits from her male UFC fighting counterpart? And if a woman can take hits from a man in the ring, is it much of a step that a woman should take hits from a man out of the ring? Is that the message we want to tell our young people? That women can take hits? That it is ok to hit a woman? How far will we go in the name of equality? I get that as a man that I can not appreciate the frustration that women feel just as I can’t appreciate the racism minorities feel. I realize I take for granted the job advancements that have come so easy, the male only poker games I have been invited to, or the “guys night” events that have led to opportunities. Until you walk a mile in those shoes, or high heals, one can only guess. Far be it from me to be one more obstacle blocking women from getting the credit and respect they deserve. I just don’t see how letting women be put in harms way, playing in violent sports, or getting hit furthers their mission for respect. What do I know? Someone will probably make a point that will lead me to quietly remove this post some time from now. Until then I am going to continue to open doors for the fairer sex.

It used to be, if you wanted to have something delivered, it was food in the form of pizza.  All of the sudden, there are a slew of delivery services popping up that deliver everything from food to alcohol to, well, anything.  There are eight services I have tried and I thought I would share my experiences.

Favor


Favor is the “easiest way to get anything in your city delivered” delivery service. The cool thing about Favor is they will deliver just about anything. The last time I asked, they did not deliver alcohol, but you can get food, groceries, suppliers, documents, and pretty much anything. Also, they are a Texas company based in Austin. Texas forever! The app is really easy to use and it is great about telling you exactly where you are in the delivery cycle with notifications when the runner get’s to the place where your stuff is at, then they have the stuff and are headed your way, and when they get there all through the app and text message. The runners where ridiculous blue tshirts, but I talked to one and he said they do pretty well. Which is not good for the user. Favor is going to charge you for whatever you get delivered (obviously), plus a $5 service charge, a $0.50 processing fee, and a mandatory tip of at least $2. So at a minimum, it is going to cost you about $7.50 to get something delivered. Kinda high in my opinion. But I have bit the bullet many a times. I would suggest you check out the four delivery options if you are getting food because if food is your desire, those may be a better option.

DoorDash


DoorDash is my go to for food delivery, all though they are really only slightly less expensive than Favor. They have a ton of options. And not only do they have a ton of options, but they have the menu for every restaurant I have checked. I walked into a restaurant I wanted to try yesterday and asked if they delivered and they suggested DoorDash. Another restaurant told me half their business came from delivery services and DoorDash was the most popular. I also think the DoorDash app is the easiest food app to use. They did a great job. They have also given me discounts on their delivery service fee. The fee is $4.99 plus tip, which I don’t remember it asking me, but I assume you can adjust that. I asked the driver how much of the $5 fee he got and he told me he had just started and didn’t know how that worked. I will update as soon as I know. DoorDash is based in Palo Alto, CA and hasn’t been around as long as Favor (by a year), but they have raised quite a bit more. 3.5X times as much. Yet another example of people throwing money around in CA. Wish more people took chances on startups in Texas.

GrubHub


GrubHub is actually a public company with a $2 billion dollar valuation. Which is crazy because I think they would put some of that into a better designed app. I have to admit, I haven’t used their service, which I will definitely try because they claim “free delivery” on several places I like. There must be some charge, so more research is needed.

Caviar


Their site shows they deliver in Dallas but when I tried the app, it showed all the places to be closed. And they are definitely not closed right now.

DoorStep

Drizly


Based in Boston, Drizly offers alcohol delivery. And I really like their logo. Great job on the logo. I have not ordered from Drizly because they don’t have craft beer and I think their beer selection kinda sucks. Their spirits selection seems to be pretty complete, which makes me think they must partner with liquor stores. And their prices are actually pretty competitive. Not sure about the delivery fee.

Minibar


Have not tried.

TopShelf


Have not tried.

Thirstie


Have not tried.

My answer to Evan Rose is too long for Twitter.  Why defund Planned Parenthood?  First, I think it is psychologically devastating for the women that get them.  I think there is strong evidence that those babies can feel pain.  Considering that there is no clear consensus, the government should not be financing abortions through insurance or organizations like Planned Parenthood.  Lastly, there are so many couples that want a child so badly and would adopt a baby in a heartbeat.

I have dated two women that have had abortions.  Over the years I have seen behavior from them that I think they would agree is unhealthy.  I can’t say definitely that having abortions is the root of this behavior but I have always suspected this.  I think the truth is a lot of women getting abortions are alone and the father has made it clear they are not going to be a part of the raising of these kids.  Are there cases where women have been raped or their child has serious physical issues and for those reasons they are getting an abortion?  Definitely, but until I see evidence to the contrary, I feel it is safe to assume that most women are very young, scared, and want to avoid being a single mother.  Physiologically and emotionally, mothers have a deep, profound connection to their children.  I think at some point, women that have abortions feel this and have a tremendous amount of regret.  I think they feel they have ended the life of the very person they were put on this earth to love unconditionally and completely and that crushes them.  Does the blood of Jesus cover this sin?  Absolutely!

I think there is a lot of disagreement as to how soon a fetus has a working nervous system and when they can feel pain.  This NY Times article cites the former president of the International Fetal Medicine and Surgery Society who says between the second and third trimester.  Some people argue sooner.  My personal belief is that life starts at conception and should be revered.

I think our federal government should provide armed forces, infrastructure, education, some social programs, and little else.  I think we should be looking to trim the fat and not how to add to our budget.  I am not sure what the actual numbers are for and against abortion, but I think it is split enough that our government should not fund it or any organization like Planned Parenthood.  If there was consensus I may feel differently, but there clearly is not.

My parents adopted my sister Jessica, who is pictured here.  My family loves Jessica very much.  As I have gotten older, I have come to realize many women and men have issues that prevented them from having children.  I have also seen couples get divorced and I think their inability to conceive may have been the cause.  I have also known tons of people that have been adopted.  They live great lives and I know they are grateful their birth mother did not get an abortion and for their adoptive parents and I know those adoptive parents are grateful to have had the opportunity to have children.  I think this is a better solution.

 

1 3 4 5 6 7 13